<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Word of the Day: Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roguereverend.com/2009/06/the-word-of-the-day-integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roguereverend.com/2009/06/the-word-of-the-day-integrity/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-word-of-the-day-integrity</link>
	<description>watch out for lightning</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.roguereverend.com/2009/06/the-word-of-the-day-integrity/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roguereverend.com/?p=136#comment-126</guid>
		<description>DavidP75 here. This is a word I've recovered from the RR, too. I generally use "integrity" to mean whole, sustainable, and consistent, as in the sentence: "The integrity of X's humanism does not depend on your judgment of its correctness."

BTW, I think your critic missed the point, which is that integrity is a broader category of wholeness than is the morality of the RR, or any single group, for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavidP75 here. This is a word I&#8217;ve recovered from the RR, too. I generally use &#8220;integrity&#8221; to mean whole, sustainable, and consistent, as in the sentence: &#8220;The integrity of X&#8217;s humanism does not depend on your judgment of its correctness.&#8221;</p>
<p>BTW, I think your critic missed the point, which is that integrity is a broader category of wholeness than is the morality of the RR, or any single group, for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.roguereverend.com/2009/06/the-word-of-the-day-integrity/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roguereverend.com/?p=136#comment-125</guid>
		<description>If you need a good ass word, try "Asnapper". It's biblical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need a good ass word, try &#8220;Asnapper&#8221;. It&#8217;s biblical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.roguereverend.com/2009/06/the-word-of-the-day-integrity/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roguereverend.com/?p=136#comment-60</guid>
		<description>No offense (and I mean REALLY - no offense), but seems to me your sort of blind, non-specific judgement about the definition of integrity on the part of the Religious Right DOES imply that for you, integrity is "...a morality of good or bad..."

I'm kind of religious, and kind of to the right, but not part of what is commonly called "tthe Religious Right," so I don't have a dog in this hunt. But we (I mean us humans) need to stop this dividing like this, especially in the religious community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense (and I mean REALLY - no offense), but seems to me your sort of blind, non-specific judgement about the definition of integrity on the part of the Religious Right DOES imply that for you, integrity is &#8220;&#8230;a morality of good or bad&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of religious, and kind of to the right, but not part of what is commonly called &#8220;tthe Religious Right,&#8221; so I don&#8217;t have a dog in this hunt. But we (I mean us humans) need to stop this dividing like this, especially in the religious community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
